Weekend at Thrackley (1934) by Alan Melville

💎 This was my second inverted mystery, and contrary to my first one, The 12.30 from Croydon by Freeman Wills Croft (published in the same year), Weekend at Thrackley was a delightful reading for me. It's commercial success - it's his debut, moreover! - made Alan Melville giving up his current job, and dedicated his energy as a full-time writer. As usual with inverted mysteries, we, readers, know from the beginning the whodunnit; and the key of the story's attraction is in the how the crime would be committed, and how the victims-to-be would extricate themselves from the villain's clutches.

💎 Captain Jim Henderson had been unemployed post World War II, and a tenant in a dingy boarding house in London, when he received an invitation from Edwin Carson - old friend of his late father - to a weekend at his country house in Thrackley, Surrey. Jim - curious and excited - accepted the invitation (who wouldn't?) And while telephoning his rich bestie, Freddie Usher, to borrow a suit, Jim learned that Freddie, too, was invited to Thrackley. He learned also, that Edwin Carson is a famous jewels collector and connoisseur. The other six guests, including Freddie Usher, were asked to bring their precious jewelry to Thrackley, to be exhibited to the host. Why, then, Jim was invited too? He's the only poor one of the guests. But maybe he was invited for more of a sentimental reason?

💎 The weekend started very nicely, with the host's amiable welcome, sumptuous food, and the countryside air. And then, we were led to Edwin Carson's sinister way of procuring new jewels to be added to his collection. And that is when this story became most entertaining. From secret cellar, elaborate lift system, hidden camera, to electrical wiring - we were provided with an ingenious plot by Alan Melville. Not mentioning the little love affair which was sweetening the mystery, and Melville's eloquent, but hilarious at the same time, style of writing. I loved its neat ending, and some of the characters are unique, like a Spanish dancer called Raoul, and Lady Stone. I liked Jim Henderson from the start - he's a perfect amateur sleuth for this story. In short, this is a delightful country-house mystery, and I'll definitely look for more of Alan Melville's!

Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐1/2

Agatha Christie Short Stories 2025 #AgathaChristieSS25: SEPTEMBER

THE JEWEL ROBBERY AT THE GRAND METROPOLITAN

(A Hercule Poirot story)

Poirot can’t resist a case, even when holidaying in Brighton with Hastings. A pearl necklace is stolen from a hotel room – only two people could have done it. And only Hercule Poirot could solve it....

This was only the second of Agatha Christie's short stories to appear in print. In the UK, it appeared in The Sketch magazine on the 14th March 1923 as The Curious Disappearance of the Opalsen Pearls and in the US it appeared in October 1923 as Mrs Opalsen's Pearls. It was first published as a book in the collection Poirot Investigates, 1924, by Bodley Head.

THE CASE OF THE MISSING LADY

(A Tommy and Tuppence story)

Having proved their deductive talents to the famous explorer Gabriel Stavansson, Tommy and Tuppence are entrusted with a new investigation: discovering the whereabouts of his missing fiancé, for which, they came across a sinister nursing home in the process. Tommy Beresford adopts a Holmesian mode for solving this case. | This story was published by Collins in the collection Partners in Crime, 1929. There was a stage performance of The Case of the Missing Lady in New York in 1950, although the details are unclear. It was apparently accompanied by a live broadcast. Both seems to be promising, especially the Poirot one (for me at least). Let's see how much we'll like them!

Mister God, This is Anna (1974) by Flynn

🧍🏻‍♀️ Flynn is a pseudonym for Sidney Hopkins, the author of Mister God, This is Anna. It is a spiritual and philosophy novel centered on the character of five-year-old Anna, who has a very intimate relationship with God - or Mister God, as she always calls Him. The story is told from the POV of Flynn, a young man of about nineteen to twenty who lives in London in the end of 1930s. Anna's background was unknown throughout the story. She was found by Flynn one foggy night, as he was wandering near London's Dockland, sat still and alone; apparently having been neglected - and most certainly been badly abused - by her parents or family. Anna never told Flynn about her past, and he never insisted.

🧍🏻‍♀️ Anna instantly clang to Flynn from their first meeting, so Flynn brought her home. His mother used to brought runaway children to their house, so she instantly took care of Anna without question. From then on Anna and Flynn were inseparable. Anna is "as busy as a bee, as inquisitive as a kitten, and as playful as a puppy." and has an uncanny way to analyze new things in out-of-the ordinary view. And, as she has a firm love to God, she somehow always manages to apply either mathematic or scientific formulas into the characteristics of God, or into the way human being perceive God and religion. Flynn's love of mathematic and science help nurturing Anna's obsession of investigation and experiments.

🧍🏻‍♀️ And so, the whole book consists of these observations on philosophy or religion or spirituality, from Anna's point of view.

"...Mister God is different. You see, Flynn, people can only love outside and can only kiss outside, but Mister God can love you right inside, and Mister God can kiss you inside, so it's different. Mister God ain't like us; we are a little bit like Mister God, but not much yet."

"...You see, everybody has got a point of view, but Mister God hasn't. Mister God has only points to view."

🧍🏻‍♀️ During the three years of her stay with Flynn, Anna is able to learn more about God and God's way better, perhaps, than an adult who's been to church every week since childhood. 

"Anna searched for Mister God and her desire was for a better understanding of him. Anna's search for Mister God was serious but gay, earnest but light-hearted, reverent but impudent, and single-minded and multi-tracked."

🧍🏻‍♀️ I loved how the story ends. World War II was looming, and Anna was beginning to distressed over the impeding war. Although her stay with Flynn was short, she had managed to wrought a beautiful friendship with him. Not only that, she had changed many lives too, touched many souls with her beautiful soul and firm devotion to God. Even her Mister God would have been touched deeply by her simple love. In short, this is a beautiful book about finding God through everything you could come across - a pure reminder for our battered souls. Though it feels rather redundant sometimes, just continue on, you'll get gems every now and then.

Rating: ⭐⭐⭐1/2

Crooked House (1949) by Agatha Christie: A Reread #20BooksofSummer2025

🩰 Crooked House is always one of my most favorites of Agatha Christie's, with its memorable 'plot-twist.' It is one of Christie's familycide mysteries - the one I enjoyed most, due too its simplicity. It's really a simple murder, at least from our, readers', point of view. The clues are there for us to see plainly, but only a few, perhaps, could solve it due to its impossibility. Well, it's not impossible, but unprecedented. I love Christie's cheekiness in this one; and it is what made Crooked House a memorable one.

🩰 It's post war, and Charles Hayward was engaged with Sophia Leonides. When her grandfather Aristide Leonides was murdered (poisoned with eserine from his own eye drops), Sophia told Charles that their marriage would never happen unless the murder is solved. Charles' father is Assistant Commissioner in Scotland Yard, and he asked Charles to stay with the family, to investigate "from the inside", along with the formal police investigation. And that's how Charles arrived at the Three Gables, the abode of the Leonides, which Sophia called the "crooked house" - inspired by the nursery rhyme: "there was a crooked man who lives in a crooked house...". Sophia acknowledge that there's the ruthlesness among the Leonides.

🩰 The family consists of Brenda - Aristide Leonides' far younger new wife; Philip (the oldest son) and his wife, with their three children: Sophia, Eustace, and Josephine; Roger (the youngest son) and his wife; an Aunt (Aristide's sister-in-law who came after her sister died); and lastly, a private tutor. One of them was widely believed to have been injecting Aristide with a dose of eserine, instead of insulin. But which one? Everyone has the opportunity - Aristide had practically provided the method of his murder to everyone. And so, the motive is what the police are seeking.

🩰 Brenda and Laurence were the "perfect" suspects. They're outsiders, and how convenient it would be that they are the murderer. But are they? Charles did his job quite nicely, mingling with the family, and got them to talk to him. His concern was for Josephine who likes snooping around, listening at doors, and playing detective. She knows too much (even bragging about knowing whodunnit), and likes to write everything in her black notebook. Charles' father asked him to watch her very closely, for her own sake. But he failed at that, because one day Josephine was found lying unconscious from a blow to her head. The murderer strikes again! They need to find the murderer as soon as possible, but which one?

🩰 Crooked House is one of Christie's fine analysis of the psychology of a murderer. What makes a murderer commit the murder? Charles' father described the characteristics of a murderer; it's a pity that Charles used more of his heart than his 'grey cell' when valuing his fiance's family. Christie also presented the theory of hereditary quite splendidly. Each member of the family, especially the direct descendants of Aristide Leonides possesses certain characteristics - good and bad, either from him or his late wife. All these aspects make this book a gem! I still loved it after this second or third reading, and though I won't ever forget the ending, I'll keep rereading it every some years.

Read for:

20 Books of Summer 2025

hosted by Annabel and Emma

The Housekeeper and the Professor (2005) by Yōko Ogawa #WITMonth #20BooksofSummer2025

🔢 In 1975, a brilliant Professor of Mathematics had a car accident, which caused a severe head injury, with a peculiar side effect. His memory of events before the accident is intact, but after 1975, the Professor lives with short-term memory of only eighty minutes. It means that after eighty minutes, his memory would be completely erased, except for that of 1975 and before. "In the simplest terms, it's as if he has a single, eighty-minute videotape inside his head, and when he records anything new, he has to record over the existing memories."

🔢 A housekeeper who works for an agency, was hired by the Professor's widowed sister-in-law, to keep house for the Professor, who is now on his sixties. He lives in a small cottage, adjunct to the sister-in-law's house. Eight other housekeepers had been hired and left, and so this one (we never get to know her name) was a little apprehensive when she arrived at the first day. The Professor is quite peculiar in appearance; his suit was worn, and several scraps of notepaper with his handwriting were pinned on it. It was his way of remembering important things. The most important one seems to be the one with "my memory lasts for eighty minutes", but after the arrival of the new housekeeper, he has a new one that says: "the new housekeeper" with a sketch of a woman's face. And that appears to be the beginning of a deep friendship.

🔢 The Professor is fond of numbers. His first greeting to the new housekeeper was: "What's your shoe number"? It's an odd way to say to a new acquaintance, but it's his way to cover his nervousness or awkwardness. After one produces him any number (shoe, telephone, birthdate, and so on), he would give you a theorem of prime numbers or factorial numbers. But the story gets much more interesting when the housekeeper's son came into the scene. He was nicknamed "Root" by the Professor, as the top of his head is flat, just like the square root symbol. Apparently the Professor cares so much for the boy, and since then, an intimate friendship wrought itself between the three unlikely persons. Either around the dinner table, or the baseball stadium, they were always happy in each other's company.

🔢 I think the biggest question that the author, Yōko Ogawa, wanted us to reflect is, whether it is possible to have an intimate relationship when one does not have memory. How can you have a deep affection to someone whom you completely forgot you've ever met before? That is something I have never thought before. Is our relationships built from things we enjoyed in the past? And if we're get rid of that; if we see the other as a stranger each time, will we recognize the bond, even if we don't understand why or how? Interesting isn't it?

🔢 On the whole, this is a thought provoking story. You'll enjoy it more, perhaps, if you love Math and/or baseball. I don't both, but I still enjoy the trio's deep relationship.

Rating: ⭐⭐⭐1/2

Read for:

20 Books of Summer 2025
hosted by Annabel and Emma

My Side of the Mountain (1959) by Jean Craighead George

🌳 Sam Gribley, a boy of about thirteen or fifteen, ran away from home, and determined to live on Catskill Mountains of upstate New York, the land of Gribley's ancestors. Every boy must have thought of running away and living in the wild; few perhaps made it true, but mostly for one or two days only before they went home. Sam Gribley, though, made it for months! And this book is telling you of his adventures, complete with detailed account of Sam's day to day activities; his way of securing shelter, water, and food, and how his wit guides him to survive even the snowiest days in winter.

🌳 Sam made his house by hollowing-up a huge and sturdy tree. How'd he done it? By learning a lot about living in the wild from books in the library. How to fish, how to burn the inside of a tree to hollow it, and how to make fire (he failed on his first night, but eventually became a pro after learning from a farmer he encountered). He eats fish he caught by his self-made rod, and learns to season it from plants or roots he forages from the forest. Sam also knows how to set traps for small animals like rabbits. But his ingenious idea came to him after watching a falcon flew on the sky. He stole a young Falcon from the nest (the mother certainly couldn't count!), and trained it to hunt food - very clever!

🌳 One of the setbacks of living alone in the wild is loneliness. Well, Sam is never very lonely. He has Frightful's - the falcon - company, but he also befriends a weasel he nicknamed the Baron. Well, it's not really Sam's pet like Frightful, but the three creatures live side by side in harmony. Sam's 'biggest' threat is rather from human being, than the animals or the weather. From campers (during summer) and hunters, to old ladies picking wild strawberries, who told reporters about the wild boy living in the forest. But the one he did make friend with is a man whom he nicknamed Bando, as he first thought him a bandit, but actually a schoolteacher who'd been lost. Funnily enough, this man - Bando - nicknamed Sam as Thoreau; what an appropriate name! I loved their friendship and everything they are doing together.

🌳 On the whole, it is delightful adventure story; informative, funny, refreshing, and insightful. The most hilarious part for me is perhaps when Sam decided to throw a Halloween party for the forest's inhabitants. He collects foods and placed them neatly around the tree. It was thrilled to see the animals' joyful gathering that night. However, at sunrise the morning after, Sam found that the party isn't over! The animals, no doubt ran out of food, ransacked Sam's inventory for the upcoming winter. And they made a whole mess in his tree house. It seems that all party is always the same, whether with human or animal guests - you inevitably found such mess the morning after. Human guests are slightly better because they know when the party is over, but the animals just didn't know when to stop!!

Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐1/2

Nancy Drew: The Hidden Staircase (1930) by Carolyn Keene

🕵🏻‍♀️ I remember perfectly when Nancy Drew entered the reading radar of my younger self; it's in between the Enid Blyton and Agatha Christie phases. I also read Hardy Boys, but only a few, it's not as riveting as Nancy Drew (or Alfred Hitchcock's Three Investigators, which came to me at the same phase). The Hidden Staircase was the second in the series, and if I have read it before, I completely forget. So, I have read it as if it's my first Nancy Drew - and I loved it!

🕵🏻‍♀️ Nancy Drew is an only child of the Drews; her mother had died, so she lives with her father, a criminal lawyer. One day, as she's alone in the house, a man called Nathan Gombet confronted her. He demanded to see Mr. Drew and accused him of having swindled the his money (which Nancy's 100% certain as impossible). Nancy threw him away finally, but the visit rather worried Nancy. Then she met two middle-aged sisters who lived in a dilapidated mansion house called Twin Elms. They believe the house was haunted; footsteps were heard at night, things or foods were mysteriously missing, and things like that. So, when her father left for a week on a mission, she decided to stay in the house to investigate, and helped the kind ladies to find peace again at their house.

🕵🏻‍♀️ Nancy checked every room, every walls, to find hidden doors or entrance where an intruder could have come from outside (as she didn't believe that ghosts are the culprit). It must have been a joke, or else, a crime. But none existed, or so Nancy thought, because I have immediately saw something fishy when the rooms and furniture were described. I was literally screamed at Nancy: there! you must check there! And I was right at the end. I guess I've read too many mysteries that something out of ordinary immediately intrigued me. Anyway, no entrance was found, but a person did enter the house at nights, and stole things. Worse for Nancy, her father was missing too! Are those two facts connected? And what about Nathan Gombet who swore he would get what he thought is his rights?

🕵🏻‍♀️ On the whole, it's unexpectedly a fast-paced mystery/detective/adventure thriller with wonderful plot, and satisfactory ending. I loved how Nancy Drew was portrayed; an independent, resourceful, highly intelligent girl who is generous and kindhearted. I liked how Nancy defended her father against Gombet's accusation. You know right away how she had been brought up with love and respect by a respectable parents. It is nice to know for sure that your father wouldn't do anything bad.

Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐